Click picture for blog Toc
 The evil one comes to steal your fruit after you have planted, watered, and God has given the increase. There are always folk who are jealous of you because you made it and they are looking for ways to prove that they are right in pulling you down especially if you are black and they are white. We shall overcomeWake County, NC officials committing Crimes of Misleading, Fraud, and Theft by Deception... Conviction of black man gained by Fraud on the court - Lying, Misleading, and Falsely Denying: Moral Concepts Inform the Law of Perjury, Fraud, and False Statements. Have you ever been lied to by someone that you trusted? Prosecutors and Defense Attorney herein named are Exposed as Liars and Cheats As Trial Reopens to Overturn/Dismiss this abuse of power! What does a writ of actual innocence provide for a person wrongfully convicted of a crime? Actual innocence is a special standard of review in legal cases to prove that a charged defendant did not commit the crimes that they were accused of, which is often applied by appellate courts to prevent a miscarriage of justice. The person convicted herein is factually and actually innocent of the charges. There were procedural errors that violated the convicted person's rights. A wrongful conviction based ... The strength of our criminal justice system depends on its accuracy — its ability to convict the guilty and to clear the innocent. But we know that wrongful convictions happen. Identifying and understanding the causes of wrongful convictions is critical to maintaining the integrity of our justice system. Conviction gained while defendant was under duress, highly medicated, sedated, and slurring speech controlled by extreme anxiety and sever panic attacks of which he was treated for and never investigated by the courts as reason to postpone trial making the conviction invalid and it must be overturned and dismissed based on the evidence of actual innocence and actions of the prosecutors and the defense attorney's ineffective counsel by stealing evidence to keep the appeal from entering the court.. A person accused of committing a criminal act is considered innocent until proven guilty. Defense lawyers started well by painting a different picture: one of a hardworking, young startup executive who believed in the mission of the company, only to see it buckle in the face of business obstacles after choosing inapt employees that ran him into bankruptcy through their non production. The business failed for a lot of reasons, but it failed in part because it made mistakes,. The owner made mistakes, but mistakes are not crimes. A failed business does not make a CEO a criminal. The owner became a half millionaire through his 8 month-long pitch of the remodeling company that he founded. The company reached a valuation of $500,000 on the basis that its ability to build room additions. The company had success as the local magazine caused him to take off thorough advertising in the community. The company imploded after a series of hiring 5 ladies in the office with various duties in admin and advertising to include superintendent and his wife who was as lost as a goose in the fog afraid of the ladies in the office. We set out to satify customers and almost reached the end to run out of money by using the profits on labor that was not true labor bringing a profit. If I had left the ladies alone and the incompetent wife at home, the company would be surviving today. My goal is to have the new attorneys in a separate trial set physical and emotional abuse to the point that it affected the owners state of mind at the time of the alleged fraud. This is a case about fraud, about lying and cheating by prosecutors and defense attorney to gain a conviction of a black man to help fill the prisons. [need 4th Circuit Court Legal assistance to overturn unconstitutionally gained conviction]…...…………Hired office workers stole money from company by accepting pay and not producing results [contracts] which forced the company into bankruptcy. These same office hoodlums became the accusers in order to become triple dippers in the system of recovery. Thieves worked the system against themselves trying to take out a black man. It didn't work. Criminal procedure is preoccupied with procedural values such as efficiency, accuracy, informed choice, and procedural fairness. This emphasis comes at the expense of the values of criminal procedure's sibling, substantive criminal law. This Article examines Alford and nolo contendere pleas as case studies in how an obsession with these procedural values blinds courts and scholars to substantive values. Defendants can in effect plead guilty by entering Alford and nolo contendere pleas, even if they protest their innocence or refuse to admit guilt. These pleas risk not only convicting innocent defendants, but also impeding the reform, education, and condemnation of guilty defendants. Moreover, these pleas leave psychological denial mechanisms in place, especially in the case of sex offenders. Regardless of how defendants respond, these pleas muddy the denunciation of the crime instead of vindicating victims as well as the community's moral norms, such as honesty and responsibility. Pleas should be reserved for those who confess. Trials are morality plays designed to acquit innocent defendants and teach lessons to guilty defendants who will not confess while vindicating their victims and the community. This approach leads to a rethinking of plea procedures and the roles of lawyers, judges, and trials in the criminal justice system. Business owner fired office staff for nonproduction and that move led to a tangled web of woven unconstitutional and illegal actions by the powers that be. The Conviction was gained by an Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress on the plaintiff who was under doctors care. FACTS · > · > 234,000.00 money in question at trial · > 180,000.00 of the 234,000.00 went to employees-accusers salaries · > Remainder went to business expenses · > · > No embezzlement equals False imprisonment, Cruel and unusual punishment causing irreparable injury and damage as detailed in this request to be given a civil/criminal defense attorney with an investigative team to carry this case to exoneration. Hugo stole business records from jury trial belonging to client proving that the accusers were paid over 180,000.00 in salaries. Hugo lied to the North Carolina Bar by saying that he would return the documents to Little and to this day never has, blocking any attempt for him to get back into court to prove his innocence of charges for a chance at being exonerated. Hugo famous last words were, do your time, nobody is going to believe a black guy anyway. He lied to the public defender of Mecklenburg County North Carolina and said the same thing that he would send the evidence and never did causing defendant to be forced to do another 11 months in prison on top of the seven years he had already done for doing exactly what the law had allowed him to do in the first place. Justice Denied - Liars & Thieves Stop at Nothing… Trusting a devious attorney who sold out his client to the highest bidder cost his client dearly in time, reputation, income, and business success. You can't trust anything someone says under duress and there must be a proper investigation into the matters herein. In this case these things happened and some on the list will be completed by team members:
Intentional tort. In instant case, the attorney plotted with the prosecution to deliberately create a hostile environment after the defendant overdosed on the witness stand before the judge. This move produced a conviction obtained by ill-gotten means. The state has to prove that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the charges. That cannot be done, couldn't then and can't now. This conviction was gained by treatment similar to being brought on by gunpoint confession. GS14-100 has not been proven with credible evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Suffering severe anxiety and extreme panic disorder while highly sedating oneself in front of the judge during testimony does not make a party guilty of violating GS14-100. Defense attorney hiding exculpatory evidence showing his clients' actual innocence shows he is guilty of a coverup and is good material for a movie. Turn this case over to FBI and other agencies for a proper investigation and they will straighten things out. They will find out why the defense attorney stole the business records and would not give them back to the client so that he could prove actually innocence. They will find out why he ignored the request of ncsbar, wake County court, Mecklenburg County court, Mecklenburg county public defender, defendants own request and request from the family to release the documents. This plea deal is illegal making the conviction not only illegal but unconstitutional. This deal violates the defendants right to be protected by the letter of the law, the U. S. Constitution. There was obstruction of justice in Wake County Nc in 1999. Manipulation of the system to give a prosecutor a leg up, clients undeserved money and a dumb attorney the attention of a lifetime to throw his client under the proverbial bus. How much did he get paid to give him up? In NC your race more times than not determines whether you are declared innocent of charges when evidence of your actual innocence is staring the powers that be smack in the middle of their face. Keep pushing. Keep fighting. Make so much noise until your screams drown out the selfish low volumed squeals of the keepers of injustice. This is the passion. This case has to be scheduled back into court. The defendant's name must be cleared. Looking forward to putting an end to this injustice. Something needs to happen about prosecutors that pursue convictions of black men at the expense of justice to fill up prison beds. It’s not fair for a young man to go to prison and lose years of his life for something he didn’t do This. needs to stop happening to people.” Appeal and bring up charges of perjury, fraud, malicious injury, against defense attorney, accusers, and prosecutors causing appellant irreparable injury.... Lying involves the creation, and simultaneous breach, of a relationship of trust between a speaker and listener. As Charles Fried has put it: Lying is wrong because when I lie I set up a relation which is essentially exploitative.... Lying violates respect and is wrong, as is any breach of trust. Every lie is a broken promise [which] is made and broken at the same moment. Every lie necessarily implies-as does every assertion-an assurance, a warranty of its truth. Legislatures and courts have thus defined misleading offenses much more broadly and flexibly than perjury or false declarations. Not only do misleading offenses not require a literally false statement, they do not require any statement at all. They can be committed by means of deceptive conduct, pictures, even silences as in this case by the accusers and defense attorney not to leave out the prosecutor. Having considered both lying offenses (such as perjury) and misleading offenses (such as fraud), we can now turn our attention to the crime of making false statements, codified most prominently in 18 U.S.C. § 1001, as well as in numerous kindred provisions of federal and state law."8 As we shall see, false statements law is a hybrid of lying and misleading rules."9 Some of these statutes are similar to perjury, in that they require both an assertion and literal falsity. Others, like fraud, require neither. A final group, which includes Section 1001 itself, has sometimes been interpreted as perjury and other times as fraud-depending on the operative statutory provision at issue, the court presiding, and the underlying facts of the case. The sum total is a complex, chameleon-like body of law with few clear governing principles. Unlike the courtroom, the business world is regarded as too complex and chaotic to allow for effective "cross-examination" of misleading statements. An intentional falsity that appears in a securities offering or real estate prospectus must be taken at its word, so that even misleading statements that are literally true might be made criminal. We also recognize a moral distinction between deception that is used offensively, to initiate a falsehood, and deception that is used defensively, to falsely deny some accusation of wrongdoing. While false denials of wrongdoing should be neither encouraged nor condoned, the fact is that they do reflect a special moral status, as is evidenced by the history of the "exculpatory no" defense to prosecution for the offense of false statements. As we have seen, legal concepts such as perjury, fraud, and exculpatory noes cannot be understood in a conceptual vacuum. They exist in an intricate relationship with ethical principles concerning matters such as lying, misleading, and falsely denying. To be sure, it is often hard enough to agree about what such moral concepts consist of, let alone how they correspond to law. Nevertheless, if we are to understand how our criminal law really works, we have no choice but to continue exploring the complex relationship between it and morality. We must start with the transcript of the case to begin our investigation. Unbeknownst to many, federal courts have the power under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to set aside judgments entered years earlier that were obtained by “fraud on the court.” Fraud on the court, however, can take many forms and courts and commentators agree that it is a nebulous concept. The power to set aside a judgment requires courts to strike a balance between the principles of justice and finality. A majority of courts require a showing, by clear and convincing evidence, of intentional fraudulent conduct specifically directed at the court itself. This standard is flawed. And courts that have adopted it are abdicating their solemn responsibility as the gatekeeper to justice because innocent victims seeking to set aside judgments obtained by abusive discovery find themselves as a square-peg trying to fit into a round hole. The remedial and equitable nature of the fraud-on-the-court doctrine and the great public policy that it embodies militates against making that burden an impossible hurdle for victims of abusive discovery. [https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1674&context=nlj] When your constitutional rights are breached during the criminal justice process, and the breach contributes to a guilty conviction, you can pursue an appeal based on an error in the criminal procedure or jury misconduct, or file a motion for a new trial. These are my intents as led by counsel... On appeal, Appellant intends to argue that the plea was not knowing and voluntary, that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of charges, that sentencing enhancement was improperly applied, and that his counsel was highly ineffective and misleading as if he flipped and began to work for the prosecutor as if the prosecutor had offered him a check to roll over on me. I am asking the Fourth Circuit affirm these contentions, holding (1) there was unconstitutional error in the court's acceptance of the guilty plea; (2) Appellant's conduct clearly satisfied the statutory requirements for a legal business as it was operated just as he was licensed and had permits to do the work that he was hired to do and there was no need to have interrupted his business for the kangaroo court that he found himself in which was designed to help the accusers to commit insurance fraud; and (3) Defendant's challenges to several aspects of his sentence were revealing that defense attorney and officials did no investigation and had no clue as to the general statues coupled with the evidence People also ask
https://www.wolittlesr.com/wesleys-blog--podcast/please-sign-my-petition Attachments and information https://youtu.be/hRVuogaJYCY Recovery
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
RSS Feed